OpenBSD/PF lacks proper documentation...WTF??
Aha. A pathetic blow on the operating system that boasts so much about security and code correctness. Apparently it seems Theo forgot about documentation. or so does the managing director of mesco think. No documentation, no manuals, wtf??? Hows one ever gonna wade thru the system.
and thats not all. seems him & co. thinks openbsd systems are non-standard as well. oh oh. now thats gonna hurt Theo. what have u been doing for the past decade or so. or better yet why the hell did those universities, government institutes, and ISPs decided to go ahead with OpenBSD. hmm. maybe cos their CIO or IT manager or Sys Admin sux. or maybe they themselves know not to differenciate good and bad technology. or maybe the companies are just no good losers. So i guess adobe's a pretty big loser then. seems a number of their firewalls are OpenBSD based. n what about DARPA. lets no go there.. i dont want two men in black suits to come knocking on my door and saying "please come with us".
so whats a standard? a click click drag drag? a fancy price tag? or something in a weird casing with knobs that u cant quite play around with? n y were no documentation was included in their website. maybe some dunno the meaning of manuals and FAQs. what about books then?. maybe the publishers didnt want to publish anything non-standard. so i guess Michael Lucas, Jacek Artymiak and Jem Matzan wud have paid the publishers a hefty sum to get their work published.
and thats not all. seems him & co. thinks openbsd systems are non-standard as well. oh oh. now thats gonna hurt Theo. what have u been doing for the past decade or so. or better yet why the hell did those universities, government institutes, and ISPs decided to go ahead with OpenBSD. hmm. maybe cos their CIO or IT manager or Sys Admin sux. or maybe they themselves know not to differenciate good and bad technology. or maybe the companies are just no good losers. So i guess adobe's a pretty big loser then. seems a number of their firewalls are OpenBSD based. n what about DARPA. lets no go there.. i dont want two men in black suits to come knocking on my door and saying "please come with us".
so whats a standard? a click click drag drag? a fancy price tag? or something in a weird casing with knobs that u cant quite play around with? n y were no documentation was included in their website. maybe some dunno the meaning of manuals and FAQs. what about books then?. maybe the publishers didnt want to publish anything non-standard. so i guess Michael Lucas, Jacek Artymiak and Jem Matzan wud have paid the publishers a hefty sum to get their work published.

5 Comments:
Microsoft documentation : Click, click, next next.. Finish. IF does not work reboot or reinstall, if all fails call M$ and pay $1 Million. But.. WTF no docs on PF? :P Wow , that news.
By
chopey, at 9:21 PM
haha...
yes these kinda guys need web based things. like ikusi.
at then end they will end up spending millions and not getting proper support. And having a huge backdoor which only the programmers will know 1st then after sometime the whole work will. root kits.
By
Anonymous, at 1:01 PM
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
By
Anonymous, at 7:22 PM
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
By
Anonymous, at 7:23 PM
point 5 of this link
By
Anonymous, at 7:25 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home